A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among prospective neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to develop their spouse and children dwelling. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their setting up permission by creating a wall outside of the boundaries in their web page, leading to an encroachment with a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably in a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, the place views of the sea are equally highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic attempts with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn proof referenced in the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the depth on the dispute. These actions were not simply symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned The most placing descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these kinds of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the Paul Feely and René Collier High Court read further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main with the dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've explained their lengthy-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out depending on Qualified information and authorized options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become far more contentious.
The Irish Moments post about René Collier noted which the businessman had Beforehand been involved with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning conditions. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to Reside together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles such as environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.